Straight answers

Short vertical video reels — repo signals — each surfacing one GitHub repository worth knowing. The full archive is on the Signals page, searchable, in reverse chronological order.

A repository worth the signal: something maintained, doing what its description claims, pulled out of GitHub's noise. A signal is a find, not an ad.

Candidates come from GitHub itself — trending, communities, and the channel's own digging. Every one is fetched from the GitHub API and checked before it gets a video: stars, licence, maintenance, whether it does what the caption claims. Anything that fails the check is dropped.

A 0 to 100 rating from the channel's own analysis of how strong a find the repo is. It's a judgment, not a popularity count — a small, sharp tool can outscore a famous one.

No. Every signal credits the repo's actual author and links to the real repository. Repomaniac surfaces repos; it doesn't own them.

YouTube, Instagram and Facebook — and every signal is logged in the archive here, searchable, in reverse chronological order.

Whenever a repo clears the check. One signal at a time — there's no quota to hit.

Not through a public form yet. If a repo is genuinely doing the work, it has a good chance of being picked up by the channel's own analysis.